Apr 16

*update: to clear up any misunderstandings i feel it necessary to preface this post by telling you that these rules are entirely sarcastic. sorry, but I don’t have a sarcasm key on my computer*#1 – …you do not tweet about Twitter.

#2 – The second rule of Twitter is, you DO NOT tweet about Twitter.

#3 – If someone says @yourname without knowing you, follows you without saying ‘hello’ or has a high follower ratio, the tweets are over.

#4 – More than one twitterati to one conversation.

#5 – Many conversations at one time.

#6 – No profile? No follow.

#7 – Tweets will go on as long as they have to.

#8 – If this is your first time on Twitter, don’t follow people; you must tweet to no one to gain credibility, then you can tweet with others.

Seriously folks, do we actually need to have rules for Twitter? Or any social media outlet for that matter? I thought the wonderful thing about this space was the freedom we all had. Freedom from judgments, freedom from rules…especially freedom from a hierarchy.

Sure, we can expect a reasonable level of courtesy from each other. Sure, if you want to run your twitter feed a particular way, then go ahead; it’s YOUR choice. But why the need to hammer down on some stranger for exploring this space on their own? Is there REALLY a right and wrong way to twitter? No, there is not. The beauty of this space is that we learn by experimenting and we learn from others by engaging.

My suggestion is that we help each other along. We provide advice and recommendations, point to posts and videos on the subject that may enlighten (not frighten). Engage in conversation. Don’t chastise when someone does something that isn’t what you THINK is right way to do it.

If you think someone is a fraud then why engage them? Why bother giving them the attention you claim they are after? You can easily ignore them. Block them. Don’t follow them back. Just like my friend Carmi states in his post on the subject, “The folks you determine as spammers aren’t annoying or time-consuming… because [you] don’t have any reason to DO anything with them.”

Call me idealistic but I would rather spend my time learning about other people, fake or real. Those who judge and point fingers needlessly are clouding the true meaning of this space.

  • Zoe
    Well jane, you weren't the first to misunderstand my sarcasm...lol. I've also updated my post to reflect that.

    i hope to see you on twitter!
  • Hi Zoe.
    I didn't think you were a twitter snob, nor did I mean to lump you in with them but your rules were an excellent example of twitter snob rules. I've updated my original post to make the distinction.
    and once I actually figure out the whole twitter thing, we can tweet.
  • BOOO Twitter Rules! :P
  • Heh... sorry! guess I'm a little sensitive about 'rules' on Twitter these days... ;)
  • Zoe
    the rules are meant to be sarcastic.

    and i totally agree with your analogy. the thing i like best is that those are your rules, that's the way you like to play on twitter. and it's okay.

    if someone else chooses to engage differently, then what is the big deal? it's they way they do it and as you said, it really doesn't affect you at all.

    see you on twitter carmi! :)
  • I would only take issue with your Twitter Rule #3. One of the points I've been trying to make this week is that joining another conversation with relevant, valuable insight is a more credible way to engage 'strangers' on Twitter. If I can only @ people I already know, how can I expand my conversation cloud to new and exciting places.

    If following is akin to subscribing to a blog's feed - as I've suggested - then replying to a tweet (using @) is like commenting on a post. The former is for my benefit alone - the latter adds value to the greater conversation.

    I'll go back to my Twitter=Cafe/Pub metaphor: what's the point of going to the bar if you can only talk to the folks you came with?
blog comments powered by Disqus
preload preload preload